This is a straightforward comparing pitting the previous generation GeForce flagship, the GTX 1080 Ti head to head against the RTX 2070 Super and RX 5700 XT in 39 games. Nosotros'll larn how the GTX 1080 Ti stacks upward versus these new "mid-range" GPUs and if yous should purchase one, something that will be answered before this article is over.

For testing, representing the carmine team we have the PowerColor RX 5700 XT Red Devil and for the green team the MSI RTX 2070 Super X Trio and MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio. Our standard GPU examination rig was used, comprising a Core i9-9900K clocked at 5GHz with 16GB of DDR4-3400 retentivity. We tested all games at 1440p and 4K resolutions, for a full of 39 titles.

Equally usual nosotros'll go through a few of these game benchmarks where we see noteworthy data to highlight and towards the end of the characteristic we'll have a few big breakdown graphs comparing all the performance data.

First up nosotros have the newly released Gears 5. The GTX 1080 Ti dominated the 2070 Super and 5700 XT, both newer GPUs averaged 76 fps at 1440p while the Pascal GPU pushed on to boilerplate 88 fps. The 1080 Ti was as well 14% faster than the 2070 Super at 4K and 25% faster than the 5700 XT.

Control is another new add-on to our battery of benchmarks, just this one seems to exist very unoptimized. All iii GPUs failed to average more than 60 fps at 1440p, so that'south pretty horrible. The game looks good, not amazing though, and certainly non good enough to justify this level of operation. So for now at least, Command looks to be a existent fps squealer.

Next upward we have War Thunder and here the 1080 Ti edged out the 2070 Super by a thirteen% margin at 1440p, though both delivered similar 1% low performance. The 1080 Ti also blew away the 5700 XT by a 34% margin and we see a similar thing at 4K, despite similar 1% low operation.

Globe of Tanks plays very well on the GTX 1080 Ti, here the Pascal GPU was xv% faster than the 2070 Super and 24% faster than the 5700 XT. That's a solid result for the older 1080 Ti, though frame rates were loftier with all GPUs at 1440p using maxed out settings. The 4K result was more than impressive, 94 fps on average from the 1080 Ti enabled an extremely smoothen gaming experience.

The GeForce GPUs are a little stronger in The Division two, the 1080 Ti for case was 13% faster than the 5700 XT at 1440p and fifteen% faster at 4K. The 1080 Ti too edged out the 2070 Super at 1440p, but matched it at the 4K resolution.

Interestingly, both the 5700 XT and 2070 Super comfortably shell the 1080 Ti in Counter-Strike Global Offensive, only given the frame rates it'southward hard to say how much information technology even matters. I also doubt many play at 4K but if you do, you tin can still expect over 200 fps with whatsoever i of these GPUs.

Recently the RTX series saw a 20-30% functioning boost in Forza Horizon 4 with the latest drivers. However, in that location has been no performance uplift for the Pascal GPUs and as a result the 1080 Ti all the same trails the 5700 XT, at least at 1440p. The results are more competitive at 4K and here the 1080 Ti matched the 5700 XT and wasn't a great deal slower than the 2070 Super.

Something we've noticed is how the older Pascal GPUs perform well in older titles, or at least titles with dated game engines. In Fortnite we see the 1080 Ti outclassing both the 2070 Super and 5700 XT at both 1440p and 4K. At the 4K resolution it was 14% faster than the 2070 Super, so a pretty handy win here.

Like Fortnite, PUBG uses the Unreal Engine four and so nosotros run across the 1080 Ti easily beating the 5700 XT, though this time information technology wasn't much faster than the 2070 Super.

Performance in F1 2022 was about identical across these iii GPUs with average frame rates ranging from 112 - 114 fps. The results at 4K were likewise very competitive, the GTX 1080 Ti matched the 5700 XT exactly.

Wolfenstein: Youngblood is a relatively new addition to our benchmark lineup and this one plays very well on the newer Turing GPUs. The 1080 Ti was 10% slower than the 2070 Super and when talking over 140 fps on boilerplate, that'due south not a big deal. The 1080 Ti was comparable to the 5700 XT at both 1440p and 4K.

All three GPUs performed very well in Apex Legends, particularly at 1440p. The GTX 1080 Ti did beat the 5700 XT by a pocket-size margin while information technology wasn't much slower than the newer RTX 2070 Super. So at 4K the GeForce GPUs delivered basically identical performance while the 5700 XT fell abroad by around a 12% margin.

For testing Rainbow Vi Siege we're manually forcing a 100% render scale with TAA enabled. Here we see all GPUs able to average over 100 fps at 1440p, the 1080 Ti and 5700 XT delivered a like one% low result, but the Pascal GPU was a little faster on average. When compared to the 2070 Super the 1080 Ti was viii% slower and we run into a similar thing at the 4K resolution as well.

The last game nosotros're going to look at before jumping into the 39 game breakdown is Monster Hunter Globe.

Here we run across very competitive performance at both tested resolutions, the 1080 Ti was a smidgen faster than the 2070 Super and 5700 XT, but overall the gaming experience was much the same.

Power Consumption

A brief note near power consumption. We don't include these on every game benchmark comparison since consumption figures don't change from the initial testing and we turn down to include thermal data every bit that can vary significantly from one model to the next. E.one thousand. not all RTX 2070 Super graphics cards run at the aforementioned temperature, so each individual model volition present some variance. The same is truthful for power consumption. Some models are more than ability hungry than others, just the discrepancy here is smaller.

Anyway, when it comes to power consumption, the GTX 1080 Ti GPU consumes effectually 27% more power than the 2070 Super GPU and around 35% more than than the 5700 XT GPU...

When comparison the unabridged system consumption the 1080 Ti consumed 15% more power than the 2070 Super and 12% more power than the 5700 XT. So while the newer GPUs are more efficient, it's not exactly going to have a noticeable affect on your system.

Performance Summary

Equally expected the two year old flagship Pascal GPU all the same packs quite the dial and has no trouble keeping up with the current functioning mid-range options from AMD and Nvidia. We've only looked at results for nearly a dozen titles, and so let's see how they compare across all 39 games tested.

GTX 1080 Ti vs. RTX 2070 Super

Every bit you lot can see on the graph below, the older GTX Pascal was three% faster on average at 1440p. Overall that means very similar operation on average, though we come across big differences when looking at individual titles in some instances. The 1080 Ti, for instance, was 16% faster in Gears five, 15% faster in World of Tanks and 13% faster in Quake Champions and State of war Thunder. It was also up to 10% slower in CSGO and Wolfenstein Youngblood, 9% slower in Forza Horizon iv and 8% slower in Rainbow Six Siege.

Of the 39 games tested the margin was seen to be 10% or less in 32 of them. Then we saw a v% margin or less in 19 of the games tested. So every bit the three% divergence on average suggests, for the almost function operation was similar.

GTX 1080 Ti vs. Radeon 5700 XT

When compared to the RX 5700 XT, the 1080 Ti was 9% faster on boilerplate at 1440p and as this effigy suggests, the GeForce GPU came out on pinnacle in significantly more titles. The outliers include a 34% victory in War Thunder and 32% in Vermintide ii, while it was as well quite a fleck faster in World of Tanks and Metro Exodus.

Closing Remarks

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti remains a very capable graphics card in belatedly 2022, no surprises there.

Many of y'all wanted this examination to accost mainly ii questions: Start, has Nvidia started to carelessness Pascal with driver optimization, in other words, has the 1080 Ti began to slip behind Turing based GPUs such as the 2070 Super? And second, should you lot buy a 1080 Ti today, and what toll range should y'all exist aiming for?

Allow'south take the driver optimization first. Nosotros're non going to go into the Nvidia gimping or nerfing performance of older generations, every bit we've looked into this numerous times in the past and ever constitute the claims to be artificial. Sure, at times we've seen commuter bugs that hurt older generations equally the focus is getting electric current-gen up to speed. Nosotros saw this when Forza Horizon iv was first released every bit an example, but Nvidia always get those issues sorted.

Actually Forza Horizon 4 is a skilful example. Recently the RTX 2070 Super saw a 30% operation boost while the 1080 Ti got a zero percent boost. This means that upon release the 2070 Super was xiii% slower than the 1080 Ti in this title, today it's 10% faster. But is this an case of Nvidia adondaning optimizations for Pascal, or is it only an instance of the Turing architecture beingness better utilized? We'd lean towards the latter, perhaps they're at present taking better advantage of Turing'southward concurrent FP32 and INT32 execution.

Whatsoever the case, as the but case we have hither, it's incommunicable to draw a existent decision from it. What nosotros can tell you lot is that upon release, the RTX 2070 (non super) was 17% slower than the 1080 Ti. Nosotros also know that on average the RTX 2070 is 12% slower than the 2070 Super, so the fact that the 1080 Ti is still 3% faster on boilerplate seems about right.

Now, should you buy the 1080 Ti? Only if the price is right. Looking at completed listings on eBay we run across that GTX 1080 Ti's are currently selling for most $500 with the nearly affordable instance priced at around $450. Honestly we were expecting them to exist much cheaper.

You tin can buy a brand new RTX 2070 Super for $510. Saving ~$60 for a second hand card that probably has been driveling a fleck, a 1080 Ti doesn't seem like a smart investment. Moreover, you can snag brand new 5700 XT's for around $425 right now, so given the 1080 Ti was on boilerplate simply ix% faster, paying a trivial more for a second hand model doesn't seem worth it. Based on today'south results, nosotros wouldn't pay more $400 for a used GTX 1080 Ti, in fact they'd only start to tempt us around the $350 mark.

Shopping Shortcuts:
  • AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX 5700 on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 2070 Super on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 2060 Super on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen ix 3900X on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen 5 3600 on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen five 2600X on Amazon